All posts by Robin

I'm a woman in my early thirties living in North Carolina, USA, and I have a lot of varied interests; I love creative writing, music composition, web design, surfing the Internet, thinking out loud, and gaming. And yes, my glasses are crooked. :)

Query: What is jQuery?

[/shameless parody of Lt. Commander Data in blog title]

Most web designers are familiar with HTML, CSS, and Javascript–they are the most basic web languages out there, forming the foundations of what the rest of the Internet is built on. Javascript in particular can make very pretty Web sites, in the sleek Web 2.0 style with subtle animations (like tidy menus you can pull out or put away with just a click).

Alas, Javascript is generally implemented through clunky individually-written or copy-pasted scripts, some outdated and some not. Poorly-written and bloated Javascript is one of the top Web features that can slow a page’s load time, as I well know from trying to load Javascript over dialup.

But what if I told you that Javascript isn’t just a random assortment of scripts and functions anymore? What if I told you that someone was bored awesome enough to gather all that Javascript can do into a single resource that developers can draw from?

It’s called jQuery…and it rocks.

What IS jQuery, Anyway?

Basically, whatever page element you’d like to animate, manipulate, or just plain select, jQuery can do that for you, just with the addition of one file to your site directory.

Think I’m kidding? Look at the detailed list of stuff jQuery can do, according to w3schools.com:

  • HTML element selections
  • HTML element manipulation
  • CSS manipulation
  • HTML event functions
  • JavaScript Effects and animations
  • HTML DOM traversal and modification
  • AJAX
  • Utilities

What this means is that you can now do page animations without images, slide various menu “panels” in and out of place temporarily, give blocks of text or images new formatting…practically all the other stuff you’re used to JavaScript being able to do. And, you can access all of those functions through code as short and simple as this:

<head>
<script type=”text/javascript” src=”jquery.js”></script>
</head>

You no longer have to copy-paste multiple iterations of <script type=”javascript”> into the <head> section of your webpages; all those functions are right there, waiting for you to ask for them (one reason it’s called “jQuery”).

jQuery’s Syntax

To include functions, you still have to put the script reference in thesection of your document, like you’re used to doing with individual JavaScripts. However, the syntax (how you write the script itself) is a little bit different.

Code Example

<html>
<head>
<script type=”text/javascript” src=”jquery.js”></script>
<script type=”text/javascript”>
$(document).ready(function(){
$(“button”).click(function(){
$(“p”).hide();
});
});
</script>
</head><body>
<h2>This is a heading</h2>
<p>This is a paragraph.</p>
<p>This is another paragraph.</p>
<button>Click me</button>
</body>
</html>

This example from w3schools.com, shown here for easy reference within this article.

Explaining This Code, Step by Step

First, you call for the jQuery library (the first <script> tag); that alerts the browser that “hey, we’re going to be doing something with this, so have your jQuery book open to the right page!”

Next, you start the individual script you’d like to run. In this case, the script’s function is to hide paragraphs when a button is clicked.

(Note: Before you have the script do anything else, it’s good practice to add in the “document ready” line before calling any other function in jQuery, because it gives the page time to load before the script starts running.)

After the “document ready” line, the actual script starts. This particular script selects all button elements on the page, and designates that when every button on this page is clicked, all elements will be hidden.

Changing This Script: Hiding One Paragraph

If, however, you wanted only one button on your page to do this effect, and only one paragraph to be hidden, you would change the script to the following:

$(“#click”).click(function(){
$(“#hideme”).hide();

And you would change the HTML code to the following:


<body>
<h2>This is a heading</h2>
<p id=”hideme”>This is a paragraph.</p>
<p>This is another paragraph.</p>
<button id=”click”>Click me</button>
</body>
</html>

In this modified example, you can see that adding an ID to both elements you want the script to use will make a difference in how the script runs. Instead of all buttons hiding all <p> elements, now only the button with the ID of “click” will affect the paragraph with the ID of “hideme”. Simple, but page-changing!

Changing This Script: Hiding One Class of Paragraphs

Say you wanted one button on your page to hide all <p> elements of a specific class? You can do that, too! Just make a tiny adjustment to the “hideme” ID, changing it to a class instead:

$(“#click”).click(function(){
$(“.hideme”).hide();

Make the corresponding change to your HTML code, like so (an additional <p> element has been added so you can test how it only hides the specific class):

<body>
<h2>This is a heading</h2>
<p>This is a paragraph.</p>
<p>This is another paragraph.</p>
<p>This is more stuff you’d like hidden.</p>
<button id=”click”>Click me</button>
</body>
</html>

More Examples of jQuery’s Abilities

You can see a couple of other examples through the w3schools website’s Try It! pages. For instance:

Fade out an element
Slide an element out of the way and back
Change the CSS of a particular element

Going Further with jQuery

If you want to learn more about the host of wonderful things jQuery can do for your webpage, the w3schools page on jQuery is a great place to start. (I’m personally going to be exploring jQuery for possible use in my domain’s next layout… :D)

Art I Don’t “Get”…and Why It Doesn’t Matter if I “Get” It

I consider myself a fairly decent “traditional” art absorber. I listen to classical music on occasion, have watched my fair share of Shakespeare plays, Broadway musicals, and staged dance productions, and have visited art galleries galore over the course of my school career. And I’ve even participated in the creation and performance of art, from drama and dance to music and visual arts. I like to think I know how to take in and appreciate art, speaking in the broadest sense.

And then, I come across spectacles like these:


Source

Source

Source

Source

…Um…yeah. These, plus those weird twisted metal sculptures that always seem to be outside big institutional buildings or performing arts centers? I just don’t know what to make of them.

An Attempt at Reasoning Out This Art

I can see why the beer belly art is funny (first pic); I live in the South U.S. and have seen a few live beer bellies that look remarkably like that (sadly enough). And I guess I can see why somebody wanted to make a car out of glass (second pic)–just ’cause they could, I suppose. The random metal animal in the middle of a field (fourth pic) is kinda weird, but I guess it’s “natural” in subject matter, so it works being stuck out in the middle of nature. And the yellow circle kinda reminds me of my Play-Doh days, modeling the clay around the base of the container…

But the question keeps rising in my mind: “WHY?” Why bother doing something like this? Is there some kind of esoteric philosophy embedded in this that I’m not getting? Is this art going to expand my mind like a ’60s-era drug if I just stare at it long enough?

What is Art without Meaning? Quite a Lot, Actually

I keep looking for meaning in the art I take in, because that’s the kind of art I like. Absurd-ism annoys me; my real life is absurd enough. And doing things “just ’cause” feels too random and meaningless. I like to take in examples of artistic expression that MEAN something to me, that change the way I think about something or show me a completely different mode of living. Just a personal preference, I suppose…

…and yet, as crazy/meaningless as I find these examples of art, there’s likely somebody who gets a lot of meaning out of them and enjoys them. The thing about art is that everyone views it differently–the yellow circle art, for instance, could be representational of anything or nothing, just something to make you think a minute.

Art is weird like that; show a random picture of anything to a crowd, and there will be people in the crowd who try to pull out meaning (like me), people who like the colors, people who hate the subject matter, and on and on. Different interpretations will be piled on, and any or none may be “correct” from the artist’s viewpoint, but they’re still all valid thoughts.

So, whether I enjoy and/or understand the meaning of such artwork is almost beside the point of art itself. The point is, somebody made it because they liked it and wanted to do it, and somebody else thought well enough of it to showcase it. Each piece of artwork, then, whether it’s traditionally “understandable” or not, is an example of someone’s personal expression, someone’s mark on the world. It might look like a big ball of excrement to me, but to someone else, perhaps, it’s life-changing. Art’s meaning is, then, all in how one approaches it.

Summary: What Do You Think?

What do you think about art like the examples I’ve shown in this article? Do you agree that art’s meaning is created by the artist’s perspective plus the viewer’s opinion? Are there art types you don’t understand that aren’t represented? Leave a comment and share your opinion!

Concentration Drugs, Woman’s Trick Question, Free Retro Fonts, and IKEA Hackers

The Drug Does Work
…but should we be using it? A drug called Modafinil, and how some college students used it to concentrate better.

Guy’s Opinion @ TheDoghouseDiaries
“Should I cut my hair short?” is apparently a whole lot like “Does this make my butt look fat?”…it’s a trap! LOL

Free Retro Fonts
26 awesome retro fonts for designers.

IKEA Hackers
People who take regular pieces of IKEA furniture and turn it into crafty amazing.

Creature Types M:TG Should Try

Magic: the Gathering is literally riddled with creatures of all different types. Whether you like Horrors or Avatars, Angels or Demons, Vampires or Humans, Goblins, Beasts, or Wizards, you’re sure to find a creature type you like in Magic. (For instance, my favorite creature types are Angels, Walls, Treefolk, Dryads, and Clerics.)

But there are a few creature types for which I’ve seen little to no representation in Magic…and I’d kinda like to see them in print.

Forestwalk Plus: The “Deer” Creature Type

I love deer, and I’m not talking about venison; they are such peaceful and graceful creatures. Living deep within the forest as my family does, we see a lot of deer in the woods around the house–they seem to know it’s a safe place where they won’t be shot or hit by cars. But the most surprising thing about them is how well they can hide. I’ve often stared right at a deer in the middle of a group of trees, and not known it was there until it moved. (And yes, I was wearing my glasses at the time, LOL)

Thus, I came up with a conceptual mechanic called “Forestshade” to capture this ability for the “Deer” creature type (or any creature that can hide itself well). I believe this would set the Deer creatures apart from the rest of Green’s creatures.

Forestshade: If controller has a basic Forest in play, this creature has Hexproof and +0/+2.

Source for Sable Fawn art
Source for Soft-Footed Doe art
Source for Regal Stag art

The “Bounding” Mechanic: The “Rabbit” Creature Type

While there have been a few Rabbits (such as Zodiac Rabbit), there are not nearly enough bunnies in the game for my liking. All that cuteness in a little itty-bitty package? You could kill your opponent with cute overload! LOL

All joking aside, I have always liked rabbits for their speed and agility, as well as their cuteness. And, like the Deer, I sought to make M:TG Rabbits different enough from other similar Green creatures to warrant making a new creature type. So I created a mechanic called “bounding”, which I feel accurately captures how bunnies bounce around and evade capture like almost no other creature I’ve ever seen. (We had two pet bunnies when I was a kid, and one of them was an escape artist…’nuff said.)

Bounding: This creature is chosen to block, but evades the attack and is not damaged. Attack is considered blocked, but neither creature’s damage is dealt.

Source for Littlest Hare art
Source for Warren of Rabbits art

A Little Bit Like Slivers: The “Noble” Creature Type

I am aware that tribe-boosting “Lord” cards like Faerie Noble/Sprite Noble, Eladamri, Lord of Leaves, Kobold Overlord, and Lords of Atlantis and Lineage have been released before. But perhaps the concept of “royalty” could be taken in a new direction?

To give M:TG perhaps a little more medieval-fantasy flair, I thought about introducing a “Noble” creature type, plus several Noble sub-types. I think this could be a fun way to incorporate the political complexity of a traditional court within a game scenario. Something like the following, where each subtype boosts its own subtype and gets bonuses for a second subtype being played:

Source for Princess Adi art
Source for Titled Knight art

What’s Your Take?

Would you play any of these creature types or use any of these mechanics? Do they seem workable within the existing M:TG framework? Let me know in the comments!

All concept card images made with the help of Magic Set Editor. Great program if you like to create your own funny or concept cards!

If You’re Saved, Act Like It!

1 John 2:4-6

4 Whoever says “I know him” but does not keep his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him, 5 but whoever keeps his word, in him truly the love of God is perfected. By this we may know that we are in him: 6 whoever says he abides in him ought to walk in the same way in which he walked.

John doesn’t beat around the bush: he’s describing a type of Christian believer who claims to be saved, but does not act in obedience to God’s commands.

Though this book of the Bible was written 2,000 years ago, this passage is still unfortunately relevant to Christians today. We all know of so-called “Christians” who act as if they’ve never cracked the Bible open in their lives. These are the kind of people who seem to revel in their own personal sins, but pass judgment on others’ sins as if they alone have God’s express permission to act in His capacity. While forgetting their own sins (or shoving them under the rug), they throw their holiness around and use it as a weapon against other people. Monday through Saturday, these people act fully like the world; Sunday mornings, however, they’re bright-eyed and bushy-tailed in church services–and they’re likely not to let you forget it!

…Now, I’ll admit something to you. While I may not throw holiness around like a mace, I do have my own personal sins that keep me from being perfect. We all do, as a matter of fact. Each of us has his or her own stumbling block of sin; Jesus’ sacrifice for us leaves us free of the burden of paying for that sin, but we still have to try to remove it so that we can be more Christlike.

In studying this three verses, it’s not the Christian who sins that is at fault. The Christian who has forgotten that he/she can still sin is at fault, instead. If you’re trying to live for Christ, but you occasionally stumble in that walk, that’s okay–you’re still doing your best to be obedient, and God sees that. But if you’re putting on an act of salvation, pretending to be all holy and righteous, while still committing (and conveniently forgetting) all kinds of sins against yourself and your fellow human beings, that’s not okay. Verse 6 is straightforward: “If you’re gonna talk the Jesus talk, then walk the Jesus walk.”

1 John is an eye-opener, much like the book of James, and it reminds us of the “best practices” of Christianity. If we choose to follow God, it’s not just a Sunday-morning or Wednesday-night commitment–it’s a 24/7/365 commitment. Pretending that sinning, without any tries at obedience, is okay because we’ve been “saved?” That’s just lying to ourselves, and lying to God. We have to at least try to follow God’s commands, even if we slip up occasionally; it’s the trying that keeps us faithful and keeps us aware of the grace we’ve been given.

If You Can’t Park It, Don’t Buy It!

More and more, I’ve seen people driving cars, SUVs and trucks like the following:


Source

Source

(Okay, okay, maybe that second pic is a little exaggerated. But to me, a driver of a very small car, these bigger vehicles kinda do look like monster trucks on the road. 😛 )

Most of the time, I coexist with these bigger cars on the road pretty well; in fact, I admire the people who seem to be able to wiggle through traffic in these tanklike creations. But what gets me about big cars and trucks is that the people who drive them…don’t seem to be able to park them very well.

Exhibits A through D:


Source

Source

Source

Source

Though I didn’t take any of these pictures, I’ve seen examples of these kinds of parking everywhere I go. It’s almost as if the people who park larger cars/trucks in this way want others to notice them so badly that they have to take up all this room in the parking lot (or in fire lanes…or wherever they decide to stop their vehicle…LOL). Not only is this annoying for others who might have been able to park there otherwise, but it also comes off as selfish and insensitive.

Solution: Parking Test/Parking Classes

But wait! This is not just the regular “whine about bad parking” blog post. I actually have a solution!

My idea for solving the parking issue: before you leave the dealership with a new car, you should be given a parking test as part of the test drive, just like your driver’s license test. Dealerships have tons of parking spaces, after all, and you’re going to be test-driving the car anyway to make sure you can handle it on the road. Why not just make sure you’re buying something you can park effectively? Driving a new car is always weird because you’re not used to the size, and that definitely goes for parking, too…it would be worth a shot!

And, if your chosen car proves to be harder to drive than you thought, perhaps “parking classes” could be offered by private instructors or even the DMV. Driver’s ed fades fast in the memory, after all–who remembers how to parallel park, right? (That’s why a lot of cars now come with “Park Assist” technology and stuff like that…LOL)

…Okay, okay, the above advice is a little tongue-in-cheek, I admit…but think about it. Couldn’t we all benefit from a parking class sometimes, especially in those lots where the spaces are about THIS MUCH too small to just whoop in there willy-nilly? I know I could, even with an itty-bitty car like mine. Maybe if we all brushed up on our parking the way we brush up on our driving for license tests, we wouldn’t have all these parking fails that so frustrate us.

…But then again, that just might put the fail-picture websites out of business entirely. xD

The “Internet Snobs:” Elitist Webmasters

We’ve all had the unfortunate experience of meeting them. From somewhere within the murky depths of the Internet, they arise, to purportedly “help” beginning webdesigners and developers…but they manage to “help” while sounding incredibly snarky and condescending. They are the “elite designers,” the peddlers of snobbery on the Web.

For sure, their reputation as “elite” designers is well-deserved, generally. They make beautiful designs, seamless coding, and always seem to be fluent in the right Web languages. But their abilities to make such lovely streamlined sites lends itself all too easily to critical judgments of others, who may not be as fluent or as strong, but who are still learning their craft.

Don’t think they exist? Never run into them? Well, here’s a couple of personal experiences I’ve had with Internet snobs:

Web-Snobs in Authority: Anecdote #1

As a fledgling designer back in ’05, wanting to drive more traffic to my site, I ended up applying to various topsites and site directories to get my link “out there” in front of others’ eyes. All was going well, until I visited a particularly beautiful web directory, which had a little “Help Wanted” box on the front page–they not only wanted more links in their directory, but wanted people who would be willing to evaluate submissions.

I jumped at the chance to help evaluate–I figured that the more websites I saw, the more understanding I would get about my own coding, and perhaps it would help me grow at the same time I helped others get admitted to the directory. I submitted my link, as well as an application to become an evaluator, and happily waited for an email back.

But alas, a few Web snobs got hold of me. A few hours later, I received a curt reply that went something like this:

Dear Robin:

To be an evaluator for (site name deleted), we feel it’s important to have a strong grasp of good design techniques. We have reviewed your site, which you submitted to the directory, and were honestly unimpressed with your content presentation skills; we do not believe you’d know the right criteria for admissions.

We are hereby rejecting your application for evaluator. Also, we suggest that you perhaps take some graphic design courses and resubmit your link at a later date, so your site will be better up to par with the rest of our directory.

So, not only was I rejected as an evaluator, but my link was rejected from the web directory. Why? Because someone had a bug up where the sun don’t shine, basically. They believed my site was designed badly, and they wasted no time making me feel like a pile of poo over it.

I admit, the design in question was not my best work ever (in fact, you can see what it looked like here–it’s Version 4), but it was an example of me trying out new things, trying to be different, trying to get comfortable with doing various design styles. I had been teaching myself web design for only two years at that point, and I didn’t have access to any courses in graphic design; I was going off of what I believed to be best practices.

I know that as a busy web directory, these guys didn’t have a lot of time to waste with nicely-phrased replies. But rejecting a link to their directory, which could have driven traffic their way no matter how badly designed the referring site was? Even now, I regard that as a pretty stupid move, motivated more by snark than common sense. It was an unnecessary flourish; I could have taken the criticism of my design alone and learned from it, but their added sucker-punch of rejecting my site in totality made it seem like an attack.

Needless to say, I was secretly very glad to hear the directory had shut down a few years later. Reason? They didn’t have enough submissions coming in, and the directory was too small to drive links. (I enjoyed quite a nice belly laugh over that irony.) Good to know that snobs don’t always win in the long run!

Mod Gone Mad: Anecdote #2

Along with trying to submit my sites to topsites and directories, I also had joined a few web design forums to learn more and maybe help other beginners out. I joined one nameless webring clique, which was a site review clique as well as a link directory, but quickly found out that according to one of the mods, I didn’t belong there.

She was a popular webmaster and builder of several useful webmaster tools and software; she also knew a whole lot more than I did about the backend part of web design. I respected her and was quite willing to sit at her proverbial feet and learn from her. But I also wanted to bring my unique perspective on web design to the clique’s forums, helping other beginners like me, writing articles much like this very post. To my surprise, she wasn’t having it.

It started with a couple of posts I made about praising websites instead of being overly critical–due to my past experience with critical judgments, I was alarmed at the amount of snarky, cutting reviews on the webring. I knew what harsh judgments could do to a beginning webmaster’s confidence, and I sought to shore up confidence and offer constructive criticism, pointing them to resources and offering to help where I could. But when I posted about praise, her response was simply “I don’t have time for praise. Next.”

OK, I thought, well, I’ll just make a few comments to some beginning designers on here and stay off the forums for a while. So I visited a couple of sites, offered each webmaster detailed help with some encouragement mixed in, and generally felt good about myself for being the bigger person and not continuing the argument. Little did I know, one of my paltry human judgments clashed with the mod’s omniscient, eternal judgment…she followed up both my review comments with suggestions that the other person should completely ignore my “sugarcoated BS,” since I didn’t know what I was talking about.

The stink of her elitism was strong in my nostrils, and in angry haste I responded to her on the forums; I told her exactly what I thought of her following me around the place and acting as if I had no right to be there. Her response: “Well, I’ve seen your designs. You tell me: does someone who doesn’t even know how to validate HTML have ANY right to advise anybody else here?”

I put up a weak response, something along the lines of “I deserve to be here as much as anybody, but I don’t deserve to be talked to like that”, and logged off. Of course, years later I thought of better comebacks, like “Well, since you apparently own the Internet and are so blasted good at this, why does your profile say ‘unemployed’?”…but of course, you never think of comebacks when you need them. That was the last time I accessed that forum, and I promptly took down the webring link and removed myself from it. I had enough snobs in my everyday life–I didn’t need another faceless snob on the Internet trying to shout me down.

What annoyed me the most about this particular mod was that I had been willing to learn from her, and had indeed sought out her advice before this incident. But her advice was always tinged with disdain, as if I “should know better” than to ask, as if I were an idiot for even forming the question in my mind. I had no issue with her being critical of my designs (though it stung badly); I took issue with her tone and how she treated me like a lesser human being. Poorer designer I may have been, but I still deserved better.

A Dirty Secret: My Own Inner Snob

I’ll admit, however, that I am not free from my own inner snobbery, and it has bitten me on the backside more often than not. When I accepted a web design job from a business halfway across the country, for instance, I privately scoffed and laughed at the previous webmaster’s poor attempts at design. I kept thinking to myself, “I could wipe my rear and end up with a better-looking design.”

Little did I know, the company’s owner had apparently loved the previous, awful look and was disappointed with my more web 2.0, sleek and modern design. (I didn’t even really get paid for the work I did, but I was glad to be rid of that contract!) I felt terrible about how I’d passed judgment on the other designer after the fact–that person was just trying to work within the (terrible) design concept, and ended up doing a better job than I did with it.

Web Elitism is Everywhere…How to Fight It?

As my stories show, it’s possible to be both a victim of Web-snobbery and a perpetrator. The key is to realize when you’re being a snob yourself, and tone it down (with an added apology to affected parties for good measure).

Truth is, we all pass judgment on each other, always trying to size each other up to see how skilled we are in comparison to others, etc. It’s like middle and high school all over again, with the “popular” crowd making all the pretty designs, the “geek” crowd with all the l33t coding skills, and the complete “n00bs” who don’t know any better than bright pink backgrounds and tabular layout designs.

Instead of playing on other people’s lack of confidence or apparent lack of skill, and hoarding all the l33t coding hacks and software tricks to ourselves, I think we web designers and developers should be more a community of designers. We don’t have to be in competition with each other–after all, we’re all trying to do the same thing, just in different languages and different programs. Elitism gets us nowhere; in fact, it can kill off confidence in newbie designers who have great potential, but little access to knowledge and tricks.

So, why don’t we put the one-upmanship aside, just for a while, and try helping out someone who might not know everything you do? Who knows, a new friend might be behind that screenname, wishing someone would chat with them and show them how to make a cool website like yours. 🙂

Doodles in the Margins

As I’ve written about before, I used to doodle quite a bit in the margins of my notebooks (and occasionally on school desks, though a good desk-washing sentence cured me of that quick smart). But while reviewing my previous doodle post, I realized I had never uploaded any examples of my smallest-scale illustrations.

So, from the production studio of an idle mind struggling to relate to the educational material in front of it, here are some of my best “itty-bitty doodles” for your amusement. 😀

Simple Anime-Eyes Faces

Because so much expression can be made with a sparkle in the eye, a twist of the mouth, and the lift of an eyebrow…I loved drawing these itty-bitty faces in and around my notes (and still do, if the backs of my church bulletins are any indication…LOL).


Happy anime-eyes

Happy Pokemon-style eyes

Bored/sad

Wistful

Long-lashed eyes, kinda flirtatious

Sleepy (or kinda ticked off/bummed…could be any)

Scared/unsure (waiting for my math test grade? LOL)

Silly face, mainly drawn near 3:00 PM xD

The Stick-Figure Circus

Most of these were drawn during high school–no wonder they feature me performing circus tricks, since you have to jump through so many hoops to be considered an “A” student. LOL


A tightrope-walker (my senior year of high school? LOL)

Juggling (and dropping) stuff
–usually how I do it

The process of a handstand…wish I could do it this easy!

Apparently, I Fancied Myself a Fashion Designer

Seriously, I used to design all kinds of spiffy fashions. Well, spiffy, but maybe not the best-drawn or the most realistic. My tastes were more towards old-school glamour in women’s fashion, as these examples show.


My attempt at a swishy skirt, semi-successful

A basic dress form (love the neckline!)

A little dash of “island girl”

The Paper Garden

Flowers, trailing vines, and all kinds of natural imagery garnished my notebook pages back in the day, and I still find myself doodling these if nothing else is on my mind (or if I’m trying to puzzle out something).


A basic little flower with balanced leaves

Vine twining around a dowel, almost like a morning glory

Clumps of grass and little flowers growing at the foot of a BIG OLE tree…just the right size to rest under and read.

Summary

Doodles, as you might have guessed, were a favorite pastime of mine (and still are, heehee). As a grownup, do you still find yourself adding a little doodle life to your memos, Post-It notes, and business meeting notes? (I hope I’m not the only one who hasn’t grown out of it…xD)

Dancing for Health, Common Oxymorons, Heartbeat Barcode, and Pen.io

Rx for Exercise: Dancing
Dancing for health benefits as well as togetherness.

15 Commonly-Used Oxymorons
Virtual reality, old news, and exact estimate were the ones I didn’t give any thought to until this article. LOL

The Man who Sold His Soul (Thump Thump)–A Threadless T-Shirt
When a heartbeat becomes a barcode, how commercial have we become?

Pen.io
Make a webpage in no time flat, share anything with anybody, with just a page name and a password.

How Do You Get Your Clix?

Amassing a collection of HeroClix is not easy, especially for those short on money. It’s not always an option to buy tons of 5-figure boosters to complete a set, or to try to get every figure of a certain keyword from eBay. But to compete in tournaments, or simply to have figures you like to play, having a fairly sizable collection is almost par for the course.

But is buying every booster pack off the shelf (or off online stores) really the best way to amass a collection you’ll actually play with? Or, is trading much better than buying, for the serious collector? Today, we’ll look at which style of collecting Clix is best for which situations.

Buy By the Booster, or By the Figure?

If your goal is to have a small collection of favorite figures, it’s cheaper to buy your Clix by the individual figure. Buy only the figures you KNOW you’ll play and KNOW you’ll enjoy, rather than junking up your collection with a pile of useless figures you won’t use.

But if your goal is to collect complete sets, or have a good box of “extra” Clix to trade with other players, it’s cheaper to buy by the booster pack (usually 5 figures) or starter pack (generally 7-10 figures). That way, you’ll end up with a wide array of figures that other people want, and/or be able to complete sets much faster.

Buy in Person or Online?

If you’re looking to buy a random assortment of newer figures and/or figure condition is not a priority, often you’ll find fair prices and good availability at little brick-and-mortar gaming stores–this way, you get the figure right in your hand, and you’re supporting little gaming shops in your area. (You also don’t have to put up with shipping costs!)

Otherwise, if you’re looking to collect specific older pieces, or you’re looking for figures in tip-top condition, you’re more likely to find what you want online, where sellers have to provide a wider inventory of Clix in better condition to get any takers. Clix don’t tend to fare well in physical stores, where they’ve likely been traded in by fellow gamers and might not be in the best of condition. Plus, the selection of older figures might be

Trade For or Buy Individual Figures?

If you don’t care about the overall condition of your Clix, but just want the figure right away, trading is a better option for collecting your preferred Clix. It’s also better if you have a big collection of extra Clix you don’t want, but other players do want. Lastly, trading is better than buying if you want to maintain the same overall size collection of Clix.

However, if you really care about the condition of your figures and you don’t have a big collection of extras to pull from, buying individual figures is probably best for you. No need to start up an extras box of junk figures just to get one figure in trade! Plus, you have more control over what condition of figure you purchase, rather than having to pull from someone else’s extras box.

(Don’t forget that you don’t have to trade Clix for Clix all the time. If you and your fellow gamers play other games in which you have more stuff for trade, you can use that as trade fodder, too. Many’s the time I’ve traded a Magic card for a HeroClix piece!)

Side Note: The Tournament-Prize and Donation Factors

Additionally, you can acquire Clix by two other ways: tournament prizes, and others’ donations to you.

Winning a tournament, or even just participating in one, can give you access to newer figures you might have never gotten otherwise. Depending on how highly you place and your personal Clix taste, you might just end up with a major score on your want list just by playing! And, even if you don’t want the piece you end up “stuck” with, you can at least use it for trade fodder, or perhaps sell it to someone else who needs it.

In terms of friendly donations, it can happen in various ways. Either the other person doesn’t care for a piece and just gives it to someone (you) to get rid of it, or it’s a piece they know you’ll like and they give it to you as a gift. This is how I’ve gotten several of my figures for my collection, and it can help you build up a collection if you’re just newly starting out.

A fellow player’s donation to you is useful in three ways: it gets you another figure you can practice playing with; if it’s a figure you like, you can keep it; if it’s a figure you don’t care for, you can use it as trade fodder. It’s a win-win-win! And who knows, you could eventually pass along the figure at some point to another Clix newbie, who might enjoy it even more.

Personal Recommendations

As a Clix player with a very limited income and not much interest in completing sets or having pristine figures, I choose to buy very selected figures online (only the ones I really, really want/need), and either trade for or buy from other players as I can otherwise. (Also, as I shared above, I get a fair amount of donations from other players by being a generally nice person, and I try to return the favor as often as I can.)

Summary

As I’ve shown in this article, getting a Clix collection started doesn’t have to be an expensive or time-consuming proposition. Whether you’re a super-completionist collector or a casual player with just a small amount of Clix, you can get hold of your most-wanted Clix in many ways just by being in an active gaming community, watching online prices, and going to local gaming shops. Just make sure your collecting stays on the legal side, all right? 🙂