I Hate Slideshow Articles!


As an Internet user, I inwardly groan upon discovering that an article I really wanted to read is actually a slideshow. In fact, it’s one of my top pet peeves of Web content formatting!

I’m not alone in this opinion: there are articles about why slideshows should be banned entirely, as well as workarounds for those of us who hate slideshows and other multi-page articles. (There are a few people who defend slideshows as a practice, but even they admit that the format can be overused.)

Since I’m both a Web content consumer AND a Web content writer, I studied this problem from both angles. Why do slideshows bother me so much, as a user, and why might Web content formatters choose this format when so many users hate it? The 4 following reasons explain why:

Why We Should Stop Using Slideshow Article Format

#1: It’s basically a strategy for getting page ads to load more often per user.

Above all, this is what irritates me about slideshow articles: they are invariably riddled with ads (including that dadgum “Ad Slide” that always pops up right in the middle of my reading and disrupts my whole thought flow). It actually feels like the content formatters are highlighting the ads INSTEAD of their content.

News flash: users hate ads! As a user, I don’t care if those ads are “paying for your site”–I don’t want to be bothered with them, ESPECIALLY not when I’m trying to read your admittedly interesting content. Making me click through a 10 or 12-page article just so you can get a few more cents feels like a huge tease. (And as a content writer, I know that the LAST thing we ever want to do is make our users feel like we think of them as money-generators and nothing else.)

#2: Because each slide is so short, the articles end up feeling skimpy on content.

You’d think that if an article is 10 pages, it would actually have some decent content, right? But unfortunately, in the slideshow format, article content is often compressed and badly written to fit alongside or under pictures. Each slide usually contains maybe 5 sentences, which may be enough to satisfy some users, but leaves this English major feeling pretty cold. Explanations are often glossed over in favor of using a picture that usually doesn’t really explain anything, and so the whole article feels rather useless.

Being a largely text-based content creator, I don’t want to waste my users’ time with insipid articles like the ones I end up clicking through all too often. If I’m taking the time to write an article, I want my users to feel like they’ve really learned something at the end of it. And I’d rather not have the format of the article steal emphasis away from my content.

#3: Slideshows don’t work well on mobile devices.

I’ve noticed this while trying to read slideshow articles on my tablet and smartphone–slideshows (especially the pictures!) are usually so huge that the mobile screen has to be scrolled around the page to read everything. And what if the screen can’t be zoomed out or in? Sorry, this content just isn’t visible, and you wasted your time clicking on this article. (Trust me, it’s happened more often than not!) There are some websites I actually just don’t visit on mobile (though I’d like to), because all their articles are slideshows and I can never read the content anyway. (Not to mention that tapping your touchscreen to advance to the next slide is very frustrating when you have big fingers and are trying to target small buttons/text!)

I realize that there are quite a few hurdles to jump when it comes to making slideshows mobile-friendly. In fact, the whole slideshow format seems ill-equipped to handle mobile users in general, from what I’ve been able to see. With that in mind, why aren’t we moving away from slideshow format to something that actually works on all devices?

#4: It makes reading the article take a lot longer.

Admittedly, this is probably my impatience/A.D.D. talking, but I am a fast reader and prefer to scan articles rather than sit and read each line word by word. Having to stop reading to click on to the next slide is an unnecessary block in my information digestion process. Not to mention that the pictures take longer to load than the text, and sometimes the slideshow article software decides to hang in the middle of the article. All of these factors make reading slideshow articles much more of a drag than they ought to be.

Those of us who write and format content for the Web have to be careful of frustrating our users like this. After all, a frustrated user is a non-returning user. Do we REALLY want people turned off from our awesome content because of the way we formatted it?

18 thoughts on “I Hate Slideshow Articles!”

  1. Hi
    I just came across this article when I googled ‘the best way to present an article’ as I thought it would be the slideshow method! At the moment my articles are just on a work document (which looks naff) can you recommend a better way.


  2. Great question! If you’re writing a blog article, I personally like to see bold headings and subheadings above paragraphs of 5 sentences or less, with a good amount of white space between paragraphs. This formatting breaks up the article into “bite-size” chunks so it doesn’t look like a daunting “Wall of Text.” 🙂

  3. Every person responsible for writing clickbait or slideshow articles (and ESPECIALLY those responsible for both, which sadly is more often the case these days) truly and earnestly deserve to be publicly stoned.

  4. I see a slideshow article and run. I’m done with them. So they lose out on me. It’s a shame because some of the “articles” may have had some good info. However, my experience is that they are usually empty, with little unique information, and take entirely to long to get through.

  5. I avoid these slideshows and just like I do with TV commercials, if you piss me off with repeats of your stupid commercial, if I am in the market for your product, I will buy your competitors product instead

  6. The only reason for slideshows or multi-page articles are for inflating page views, more ads, or both. And in most cases, it’s both. Nowadays, when I want to read an article and I see that it is a slideshow, I hit the back button faster than lightning and read it on another website that actually puts it on one page.

    In short, slideshows exist for selfish reasons, and I will not be a part of it.

  7. Thank you for this article. The slide show news is very annoying and the content isn’t worth it. It all seems to be migrating in that direction for most news articles. It doesn’t make me want to buy what they advertise it makes me not want to visit the primary site. I stopped watching news because it wasn’t interesting and turned to the internet for interesting tidy bits about interesting things. They opened and apartment after 70 years and they found priceless artifacts and pieces of history inside but by slide show 6 I was just irritated by the clicking and left the article. And they write so little per photo. I hope the advertisers know that just because we click next doesn’t mean we are interested in anything they have to say or sell.

  8. I couldn’t agree more! I am much more likely to investigate a product if it isn’t pushed at me through spammy-looking ads anyway, and seeing them plastered all the way through a clickbait article drives me crazy. I keep hoping websites will take notice of users’ dislikes and start reformatting their content, but then again, the ad companies must pay very well… sigh.

  9. If I click on a link and it is a slide show–I close the window and google the topic. Basically, I think there are evil writers out there who find interesting articles and think, “How can I make money on this by making it a slide show with lots of ads?”

    No thank you!

  10. I also will not give slideshow articles the time of day. They are the most deceiving of articles on the internet, they are useless and probably like what the cable companies call free HD TV lies…….

  11. Talk about a colossal waste of time! By the time you get to the actual meat of the story, you’ve lost your appetite. The stories start out with great entry line…”They weren’t even puppies!” 40 minutes later, you find out they were fox kits….who cares!

  12. The slideshows I watch (reluctantly) have another problem – – that of “jumping” the “next slide” panel just enough to have the viewer’s click go onto an expanded ad mentioned just above the “next slide” panel. Is there a body of regulators who can (and should) prevent this? Is it aol or some other communications group? It is extremely annoying and adds to the general dislike of those slideshow presentations. Thanks for any suggestions as to how to pursue this complaint formally.

  13. Often times there will be something that got you to click in the first place. Copy that and paste it into google, do a search. You can probably locate a wikipedia article or something else that satisfies your curiosity.

    To hell with wading through the slideshow.

  14. Because of poorly written, bloated, click-bait slideshows I now support articles like this by clicking. So, congrats to the awful void-of-legitimate-content slideshows?

    But yeah, they really are garbage. Not just the format but the articles themselves, every time. I just “did” one because once in a while I get suckered into the stubborn “well I’ll just keep clicking to see how it ends” mindset. Inconsistent page loading had me accidentally clicking additonal sponsor links unintentionally (as they’re designed to function). And the few times I stopped to read the meager ‘Tweet’ character-limit-content, it was wordy and redundant. Ie, time and braincells wasted.

    Ans here’s the absolute worst part. Why do I keep having to worry about stepping on a slideshow landmine, and why do I occassionally willfully walk right into a sucker punch? Because I’m clicking sponsor links on legitimate information sites like CNN (and all the major outlets like fox, NBC, ABC, etc pull the same shenanigans). Yes, they’re labeled sponsor links. But… Why? Just why???

    The internet is vast and media is saturated, so I’m sure they can be a tad more selective with ads and sponsors. It’s one thing to be misled and waylaid by search engine algorithms, social media, and ones self. It’s infuriatingly bizzare when legitimate and reputable sites, point you to the garbage they try hard to be better than.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.